
One of the most common questions we hear from homeowners and HOA boards is simple: "Who do we even go after?"
The confusion makes sense. The builder's sales office closed years ago, the developer entity that sold the homes may no longer exist on paper, the roofing crew was a subcontractor nobody in the community ever met, and the window supplier sits in another state.
Meanwhile, you are living with the leaks, the cracked foundations, the failing stucco, and the special assessments while the parties who caused the problem point fingers at each other.
Here is the reassurance. In a construction defect case, liability is almost never a single-party question. It is an allocation question.
Across more than 1,000 resolved cases and more than $500 million recovered for homeowners and HOAs, we know that identifying every responsible party early is what separates a modest settlement from full recovery. Below we explain who can be held liable, why claims name multiple parties, how the chain of contracts affects what you can actually collect, and why the answer changes your case strategy and value.
Colorado does not use the everyday word "builder." It uses a defined legal term: "construction professional."
The Construction Defect Action Reform Act, C.R.S. sections 13-20-801 through 13-20-807, defines that term broadly to include developers, general contractors, subcontractors, design professionals such as architects and engineers.The practical takeaway is that the statute was written wide enough to capture nearly everyone who touched the project.
CDARA arrived through House Bill 01-1166. As the Colorado General Assembly Legislative Council Staff background memorandum on CDARA explains, the legislature created a separate legal track for defect claims involving real property, distinct from ordinary negligence lawsuits, with its own procedures and deadlines.
One of those procedures is a pre-suit notice of claim and opportunity to repair, and it applies to each party you intend to sue.
In most cases we investigate, responsibility is shared among five categories of construction professionals.
Why Do Construction Defect Claims Name So Many Parties at Once?
First, causation is layered. A single leak can involve a design detail that was wrong, a subcontractor who installed it incorrectly anyway, a GC who never inspected it, and a product that failed early. You often cannot know the split until experts open the walls.
Second, finger-pointing is the default defense. Each defendant's first move is usually to blame someone who is not in the case, and naming all potentially responsible parties removes that escape hatch and keeps everyone at the table.
Third, insurance. Each party typically carries its own liability policy, and each policy is a separate potential source of recovery, which directly affects settlement value.
Fourth, allocation. Colorado allocates fault among responsible parties. If a party who caused 40 percent of the damage is not in the case, that 40 percent can become unrecoverable.
We treat party identification as forensic work done at the start of a case, not as an afterthought.
Homeowners and HOAs usually have a direct contract only with the developer or seller. You have no contract with the general contractor, subcontractors, the engineer, or the window manufacturer. That is the chain of contracts problem.
Practically, warranty and contract claims typically run against the party you actually bought from. Negligence claims can reach further down the chain to the parties whose work fell below the standard of care.
This matters to your bottom line. Unless there is insurance or you are suing a solvent construction professional with significant assets, you will likely recover nothing.
Purchase documents, declarations, plans, permits, and subcontractor lists are the roadmap. Preserve them.
Remember also that under C.R.S. sections 13-20-801 through 13-20-807, notice obligations must be satisfied as to each construction professional you intend to pursue.
Liability is not only about who did what. It is about who can still be sued.
Under C.R.S. section 13-80-104, a two-year statute of limitations generally runs from when the defect is discovered or should have been discovered.
There is also a six-year statute of repose measured from substantial completion, which can extend to eight years in certain circumstances.
The consequence is hard but important. A homeowner who waits can lose the right to pursue the very party whose insurance policy held the most value, leaving only the insolvent defendant behind.
Signs like recurring water intrusion, cracking drywall, sticking doors and windows, sloping floors, and stucco failure should trigger a call, not a wait-and-see approach.
A document and timeline review costs nothing and often determines whether a claim is still viable.
Who is liable is not a technicality. It is the single biggest driver of case strategy and value.
A case valued at a few hundred thousand dollars against one defendant can be worth multiples of that once every responsible party is properly identified and named.
You should not have to become a construction law expert to protect your largest asset.
When you are ready, contact us for a no-cost review of your documents and timeline.
You do not need to know who is liable before you call. That is what we determine.
Learn more about our construction defect litigation practice.